Talk:Hanger

A hidden reference?
Coat hangers have a reputation for being used in self-induced, improvised abortions. The way Heather unfolds the coat hanger to pull down the ladder is also somewhat suggestive of the way it's unfolded before being used for that purpose. I think references to abortion in this game are significant, because (SPOILERS) the only way for Heather to survive the birth of the God is to remove the God's fetal form from her body via "Daddy's little present" and let it die in a bloody mess on the floor--a magically-assisted abortion, in other words.(END SPOILERS)--Mazryonh (talk) 03:14, May 29, 2013 (UTC)


 * The hanger is used once to pull down a ladder and is not given any special significance over the myriad of other items Heather uses and discards. I highly, highly doubt it was intentionally added as a reference.  AlessaGillespie  Talk   Contributions  05:02, May 29, 2013 (UTC)

The hanger reference

 * "The Hanger could be a reference to abortion, albeit an extremely makeshift one. This coincides with the birth and maternity motif of the game, and Heather's desperation to remove the god from her womb."

I believe we should keep this because I think it's a highly possible theory given the absurd nature of the series, maternal themes in the game, and the fact that the hanger is used where Heather was adjusting her Aglaophotis (abortion pill) in the opening of the game.

If you want to vote for, neutral or against, or merely leave a comment, leave one here. Also, if you feel the above trivia point should be kept but reworded somehow, let me know.

PLEASE KEEP IT CIVIL: no name-calling or harassing others. — Alex Shepherd   ツ  00:08, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Votes for yes
I vote yes, per above. — Alex Shepherd   ツ  00:39, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

I vote yes, seems plausible enough even if there are also innocuous explanations. MeganeEarthmate (talk) 00:30, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Votes for no
I vote no. --Fireworks888 (talk) 00:11, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

no -- Dirtbag Daryl 00:12, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

No. Smegro (talk) 00:18, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

No. Unnecesarry Scooterbilly (talk) 00:19, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

No. Scrotesack Jack (talk) 00:24, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

i vote no there is no reason or proof for this Joe Scotty the Manicotti (talk) 00:27, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

i vote no. Spanky dog jew boy (talk) 00:34, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

No GAPE NEWELL (talk) 00:39, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

No. This change is utterly senseless. Eric Fat Poodle Boy (talk) 00:43, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

NO Uncle Gubsy 5 Million (talk) 00:49, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

It's a no for me, fellas. Prince I Mean Beanboy (talk) 00:58, July 30, 2016 (UTC)

Seems to be a resounding "nope." And nope, it shall be. -- Murphy Pendleton  :D  06:10, July 30, 2016 (UTC)